top of page
Writer's pictureMuhammet Fatih Vergili

The End of the Eastern Question: The Transformation of the Middle East after 1918


 

The end of the First World War marked an important turning point in the history of the Middle East, particularly in relation to the Eastern Question. The Eastern Question began to emerge in the 18th century as a result of a series of Ottoman defeats against Russia and the losses suffered as a result of these defeats (Davies, 1996). The first time it was mentioned as a term in a document was at the Congress of Vienna in 1815. The European states, especially France and Britain, wanted to share the Ottoman lands, but Russia, which was rising as a major power in the east, threatened them and stood against them as a rival. France and Britain supported the Ottoman Empire against Russia in order to better share the “sick man” Ottoman Empire. This meant that the Eastern Question could not be resolved until WWI. After WWI, the Ottoman Empire was divided into many parts and the Eastern Question branched out into 4 main issues: changes in borders, sectarian conflicts, the emergence of Arab states and the changing face of colonialism under the name of “mandate”.


In order to grasp the implications of the end of the Eastern Question, it is essential to delve into its historical backdrop. As the Ottoman Empire experienced a decline, it gradually lost control over numerous territories, resulting in power vacuums and rivalries among European powers. The war presented a unique opportunity for the Middle East to undergo profound transformations that would leave an indelible mark on the region for generations to come. First of all, the end of the Eastern Question led to border changes in the Middle East, dismantling the Ottoman Empire and giving rise to new nation-states. Sykes-Picot Agreement and subsequent treaties defined the new geopolitical landscape, disregarding ethnic, religious, and tribal affiliations. Moreover, nationalism worsened tensions as new states sought independence and identity. Another consequence of the end of the Eastern Question was the imposition of mandates by the League of Nations on the former Ottoman territories (Spielvogel, 2009). European powers like Britain and France shaped the region’s politics, economy, and society. Mandates enabled resource exploitation, client regimes, and colonial dominance. This era saw authoritarianism, stifling local aspirations, and fueling regional conflicts. Thirdly, the end of the Eastern Question had a profound impact on the Arab world. The British promises of Arab independence and self-determination, as seen in the HusseinMcMahon Correspondence and the Balfour Declaration, fell short of expectations. This disillusionment and perceived betrayal fueled deep resentment among Arab nationalists, sparking the Arab Revolt. Furthermore, the establishment of Israel in 1948 heightened regional tensions, leading to multiple Arab-Israeli conflicts and the emergence of the Palestinian refugee crisis. Lastly, the end of the Eastern Question left a lasting legacy of entrenched sectarianism and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. The arbitrary borders and power struggles after the war sowed the seeds of sectarian tensions and rivalries. Ethnic and religious groups, including Sunnis, Shias, Kurds, faced marginalization and intergroup strife. The rise of extremist ideologies like Pan-Arabism and Pan-Islamism further destabilized the region, perpetuating conflicts and enduring violence.


The conclusion of the Eastern Question post-World War I brought about profound transformations in the Middle East. The reconfiguration of borders, imposition of mandates (perpetuation of colonial influence), and unfulfilled national aspirations of diverse ethnic and religious groups have indelibly shaped the region’s history and continue to influence its present dynamics. A comprehensive understanding of this historical context is vital in analyzing the contemporary challenges faced by the Middle East, with a collective effort towards fostering solutions that foster peace, stability, and inclusive governance.


References


Davies, N. (1996). Europe: A history (7th ed.). Oxford University.


Spielvogel, J. J. (2009). Western civilization (7th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.

Comments


bottom of page